Tuesday, 31 July 2012

Sustainability Science

A quick observation on sustainability science.  What is it? Well in parallel to discussions about the  form and function of a sustainable development  academic debates  have centred around sustainable development as a catalyst for a new way of understanding the world. This is borne from the realisation that the problems faced by the world today are themselves complex, uncertain, and non-linear and do not fit neatly into the division of academic disciplines within educational institutional frameworks we have today. As Sachs points out (2008) the problems simply refuse to arrive in the neat little packages of academic departments. Climate change is an exemplar of this point described as a wicked problem (Hulme 2009).  In particular, sustainable development has been described as an orchestration of the science with the rapid progress of perspectives that centre around   interdisciplinary and   trans disciplinarily as well as coalescing ideas around complexity and systems thinking. 

So from an evolution of sustainable development as a concept from an environmental perspective to a three pillars approach (environment, society and economy) what has now emerged is a new perspective on science (Bettencourt and Kaur 2011; Kates 2011). So if I use again, and apologies for doing so because it is overused, a venn diagram to illustrate where sustainability science might be positioned.
 
















Discuss at length if you were so inclined, about th absense of the economic dimenions and the  lack of power dynamics that exist in this interpretation. Nevertheless, it is a usefull visualisation.  But if its definitions you are looking for as I often am then you could do a lot worse than Kates interpretation.
According to Kates Sustainabiliy Science is described as ‘an emerging field of research dealing with the interaftions between natural and social systems and with how those interactions affect the challenge of sustainability’ (Kates 2011:19449).

References
Bettencourt, L., and Kaur J., (2011) Evolution and Sructure of Sustainability Science PNAS 108:49:19540-19545
Hulme, M., (2009) Why we Disagree about climate Change, Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunities, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Kates, R., (2011) What kind of science is sustainability science? PNAS 108(49):19449-19450
Sachs, (2008) Common Wealth, Economics for a Crowded Planet, New York, Penguin Press

Sustainable Development and Surfing





Over the past 15 years I have been researching what sustainable development and sustainability mean and how these terms are translated into real world programmes, initiatives and policies.   I have done this at the United Nations, at the national government level, local government, I’ve looked at the sustainability of 2012 Olympics in London this year as well as exploring community and individual responses to risks such as climate change.    As a surfer of over 20 years, mostly in the cold and fickle waves of the South West of England, it was only a matter of time before I started exploring sustainable development in the surfing world. What follows are some thoughts on sustainable development, surfing and an emerging area of research.
I start in recent history with the  United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development or  Rio +20 as it is popularly known that took place last week between the 20th and 22 nd June. The very predictable debates over its success or otherwise will now stretch out over the coming weeks.  The outcome document, ‘The Future we Want’ has been described by Ban Ki Moon, Secretary General of the United Nations as a firm foundation for social, economic and environmental well being.  On the other hand groups like Oxfam and Greenpeace have expressed some serious concerns about the real world impacts of the conference.  I am not going to expand on this here but whatever your stance on the conference and the outcomes it has undoubtedly highlighted and reinforced the unsustainable nature of humanities current developmental pathways as an exponentially rising global population  relies on an ever diminishing and unevenly distributed resource base. 
The conference has also highlights how difficult the term sustainable development is to define and  and it remains a contested and ambiguous concept. It has been described as an oxymoron, that no development by its very nature can be sustainable, some say that it means all thing to all people and so, ultimately means nothing.  Perhaps, the most serious accusation is that it is a term that does nothing more than legitimise existing modes or production and consumption, and as we all know, they don’t really work. 

With that in mind I am a proponent of sustainable development, I believe it is the most
important term of the 21st Century and provides a focal point around which different cultures, different, religions, different sectors can come together and discuss the multiple and complex impacts humanity is having on our planet.  Its basic definition from the Bruntland Commission’s 1987 report ‘Our Common Future’ (WCED 1987) says it is ‘development that meets the needs of current populations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’. This definition was again enforced at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, the Rio Earth Summit in 1992.  It was at this summit that Agenda 21 (UN 1992) was borne, considered by many to be the blue print for a sustainable development.

In the 20 years between the first Rio summit in 1992 and its most recent incarnation, the meaning and context of the concept has altered significantly.  Initially, focused on the environment, now the term is broader with the three pillars, or the triple bottom line of environment, society and the economy constituting its definition. Recent work, including my own now emphasises the complexity and systems approach to sustainable development exploring governance and the role of multiple stakeholders.


With this woefully inadequate potted history, definition and emerging perspectives on sustainable development established it is at this point that I bring sustainable development and surfing together. I am not going to outline impacts relating to surfing, I’ll only point out that with an estimated 10 million surfers in 120 countries and an industry worth in excess of six billion dollars surfing as a unique activity is a significant player on the international stage in many different areas.  These range from the impacts on local communities through the rapid rise of surf tourism to the impact of the production and consumption of surfing related products, shorts, wetsuits boards etc.  As with other sector of society the language of   sustainability is being used to grapple with the multiple issues that relate to surfing.
Of course, what the term means within the surfing world will inevitably alter and change depending on what area is being looked at, and so it should, it is not a constant it is evolving and it is complex and it will mean different things to different people with different values and priorities. So with that said I do not offer up a definition of what sustainability should be. I do not suggest that there should be at some distant point in the future an ideal situation or utopian vision. Instead I urge an interrogation of the term and what it’s being applied to.  This interrogation starts with a very simple question. How is sustainability being used and in what context? It means looking very carefully at ‘sustainability claims’. It means understanding for example what is meant by sustainable surf tourism, understanding the impacts and processes, asking the right questions and challenging the established status quo. It’s about accommodating diversity, conflict and different visions. What it absolutely should not mean and referring back to the most serious criticisms of sustainable development, it should not be about business as usual.

I have only begun to explore these questions and I start modestly.  But I cautiously see some genuine and exciting changes within the surfing world.  There are a number of internal and external variables I could point to  support this claim, but for now I  will only outline three key areas. Firstly, the mediums for the serious exchange of ideas, thought and commentary within the surfing world have significantly evolved or maybe grown up. The Inertia is an example of this with Forbes describing it as the Huffington Post for surfers. The creation of the website The Greener Blue with a specific focus on surfing and sustainability is another  example of this.  Secondly, a very visible change is the increasing effectiveness of non profit organisations that specifically focus on sustainability.  In particular,  Sustainable Surf and  its programmes related to market transformation within the surfing industry is an example of the need for changing towards a more sustainable model of doing business.  Their Waste to Waves programme has been successful not only from a recycling perspective but also in moving the debates around recycling and pollution in surfing into the mainstream media, with as an example an article in Forbes.  The greening of the San Francisco Ripcurl Pro and the subsequent partnership with the Association of  Surfing Professional leading to the sustainability initiatives at the Volcom Fiji pro through the Deep Blue Surfing initiative are yet more examples.  

Thirdly, the establishment of the world’s first ever Center for Surf Research at San Diego State University.  This has provided a focal point for industry, non for profit organisations,  and academia to come together and discuss the specific and unique dynamics of the surfing world.  The conference in January of this year organised by the Center and the Groundswell Society,  ‘Surfings New Aloha: The Growing Trend of Giving Back’ drew on a range of people all relating to the surfing world all trying to make a difference and understand the future of what I see as different aspects of sustainability and surfing.

As with the Rio conference this represents a process that begins to articulate the problem in a comprehensive fashion that in turn facilitates discussions of the solutions.   Over the coming months I will be working with both Sustainable Surf and The Center for Surf Research to continue these discussions and conduct research that aims to understand sustainability within the surfing world.   This has begun with the UK’s  first research group focused specifically on sustainability and surfing at Plymouth University, The Plymouth Sustainability and Surfing research group. 

I consider this article to be part of the process of understanding what sustainability is in surfing and what triggers are needed to build momentum on this initial transition.  I would like to ask as many people as possible reading this to comment on what they believe this should look like and what should happen next. 

* A Revised version of this article  appears in the  www.theinertia.com  http://www.theinertia.com/environment/sustainable-development-and-surfing/


Monday, 9 July 2012

Neighbourhood Community Budgets


On Friday myself, Dr Rory Shand (Plymouth University) and colleagues from around the  country were invited to the Department of Communities and Local Goverment (DCLG) at Eland House, London, to explore ways of evaluating the newly initiated Pilots for the Neighbourhood Community Budgets programme.  The neighbourhood community budget programme was developed in 2012, it includes 12 neighbourhood areas in 10 community areas around the country. A Community Budget gives local public service partners the freedom to work together to redesign services around the needs of citizens, improving outcomes, reducing duplication and waste and  so saving significant sums of public money. According to DGLC a successful community budget will be able to deliver a better service to residents because it can:

·    make better use of its resources, including pooling the budgets of all agencies where it is effective to do so, including local knowledge, community assets and voluntary effort

·    remove central rules and regulations so local professionals can deliver better services by redesigning them so delivery is more effective for residents

·    give people greater control over their local public services

·    establish appropriate local partnership and governance arrangements to create a unified approach that suits their area.

These programmes represent the broader principles of Localism and of course the ideals of the Coalition Governments Big Society. From my perspective I see an opportunity here for continued exploration into the nature of sustainable communities and policy initiatives that sit under the umbrella of sustainable development at the local level. This work will feed directly into my existing research on town and parish councils which sought to understand the governance of sustainable development at the local level in Devon and Cornwall.